On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. reshaped the landscape of federal court authority by restricting nationwide injunctions. This ruling limits district courts from issuing broad orders that block executive actions beyond the specific plaintiffs involved in a case. For federal employees facing potential mass layoffs or reductions in force (RIFs), a critical footnote in the majority opinion offers a potential lifeline, preserving certain protections under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
The Court’s decision, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, clarified that federal district courts must tailor relief to the parties directly involved, avoiding overbroad injunctions that halt policies nationwide. However, the footnote specifies that the ruling does not resolve whether the APA authorizes courts to vacate federal agency actions entirely. This distinction is significant for federal workers. District courts have previously relied on the APA to issue injunctions blocking mass firings at agencies like the Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs. These injunctions have paused large-scale layoffs, protecting employees represented by unions or states.
Skye Perryman, president of Democracy Forward and a key figure in these lawsuits, emphasized that the APA’s protections against “unlawful, arbitrary, and capricious governmental action” remain intact. This allows courts to potentially continue issuing relief under the APA, safeguarding federal employees from widespread job cuts. For instance, ongoing lawsuits challenging RIFs could still leverage the APA to maintain or refine existing injunctions, ensuring they are “no broader than necessary” for plaintiffs with standing, as directed by the Court.
While the ruling narrows the scope of nationwide injunctions, the APA’s unresolved status in this context provides a pathway for federal employees to challenge agency actions. Lower courts will now refine these injunctions, determining how broadly relief can extend. For federal workers, this footnote could delay or mitigate job losses, offering stability amid policy shifts. Employees facing such uncertainties should stay informed and consult legal or union representatives to understand how these protections apply to their roles.
Check in with DailyFed to keep track of the latest news affecting the federal workforce.
